For our 2026 Global Tennis Academy Report, we spent months talking to the people building youth sports development today - an investor, a performance architect, an academy director, a founder, a parent advocate, a VC. We asked them what actually keeps a young athlete in a program long-term. None of them talked about talent.

The Retention Thesis

Wayne Kimmel isn't a coach. As Managing Partner at SeventySix Capital, he's spent years watching what makes sports businesses succeed or fail from the outside - and his read on youth athletics applies well beyond any one sport.

Wayne Kimmel, Managing Partner at SeventySix Capital: Kids don't quit sports because they are not good enough. They quit when the experience stops making sense.
Wayne Kimmel, Managing Partner at SeventySix Capital

It's a simple line, but it reframes the entire retention problem. Programs spend most of their energy on the part that was never really at risk - the coaching. The part that quietly drives families out the door is everything around it.

The 23 Hours Nobody's Tracking

Duey Evans, a performance architect who has spent his career studying how development actually compounds, put a number on the gap.

Duey Evans, Performance Architect: The gap in junior development programs is not on-court hours. It is the 23 hours between sessions - and whether what happened on Saturday is informing what the coach does on Monday. Most academies measure the output of development. Very few measure the process.
Duey Evans, Performance Architect, Creator of Communiplasticity

Most programs can tell you an athlete's ranking, their win-loss record, their stats. Almost none can tell you what happened to that athlete between Saturday's competition and Monday's session - whether a loss shook their confidence, whether a conversation in the car made things better or worse. That's the layer Evans is pointing to, and it's the layer that decides whether an athlete shows up next season.

What Directors Think Families Know

Brenton Barker, an international governing executive who has sat across the table from program leadership around the world, sees the same blind spot everywhere he looks.

Brenton Barker, International Governing Executive: Directors feel they have a clear philosophy - but parents are often disconnected because communication gets filtered through coaches. The result is a disconnect between what directors think families understand and what's actually happening on the ground.
Brenton Barker, International Governing Executive

Every director we spoke with could articulate their development philosophy clearly and confidently. Almost none of that philosophy reaches parents intact. It passes through a coach, gets compressed into a two-minute pickup conversation, and arrives at the family as fragments. The director isn't wrong about their program. They're wrong about how much of it actually lands.

The Hardest Age Is a Team Sport

Emilio Sanchez Vicario has built one of the most respected academy brands in tennis, but the pattern he's describing shows up in any sport once athletes hit adolescence.

Emilio Sanchez Vicario, CEO and Founder at Emilio Sanchez Academy: Parents want the best for their kids - and puberty is a tough moment in that relationship. We help them align. We are a team, and the student needs to find himself. This journey will not only make them great competitors but also great kids with strong characters.
Emilio Sanchez Vicario, CEO & Founder, Emilio Sanchez Academy

Notice what he's optimizing for. Not just competitive results - alignment between a parent and a child who are navigating adolescence together, often for the first time, with sport as the pressure cooker. Programs that treat this as a coaching problem alone are missing half of what actually keeps a family around.

The Emotional System Nobody Puts in a Report

Iñaki Etxegia runs the Ferrero Academy day to day, and when we asked him what's genuinely hardest to manage, his answer wasn't about scheduling or results.

Iñaki Etxegia, CEO at Ferrero Academy: The hardest thing to manage is not the schedule or the results. It is the emotional system parents bring with them. You cannot put that in a report.
Iñaki Etxegia, CEO, Ferrero Academy

That last line is worth sitting with. Programs are good at measuring what's measurable - drills, competitions, standings. The thing that actually determines whether a family stays or leaves is much harder to quantify, and most have no structured way to even see it, let alone manage it.

Marketing vs. Development

Lisa Stone founded Parenting Aces to help sports parents navigate exactly this kind of terrain, and she's blunt about where families get burned.

Lisa Stone, Founder, Parenting Aces: Many academies are better at marketing than actual development. Families don't realize until they've wasted months - or even years - and significant money, that the training their child is receiving is not adequately preparing them to advance.
Lisa Stone, Founder, Parenting Aces

This is the trust problem underneath the retention problem. A family can't tell the difference between a program that's developing their kid and one that's just good at selling itself - not until real time has passed and real money has been spent. The programs that close that gap by making development visible early are the ones families end up trusting.

Retention Is a Signal-Detection Problem

Karel Zheng invests in sports technology for a living, and when we asked him where he'd put his money to solve retention, he didn't talk about coaching at all.

Karel Zheng, General Partner at Kaya.VC: The dropout problem is largely a signal detection problem. Technology that surfaces early warning signs - stress, motivation dips, recovery - before a kid checks out mentally is where I'd bet.
Karel Zheng, General Partner, Kaya.VC

By the time a family says they're leaving, the decision was usually made weeks earlier. The signals - an athlete going quiet, a parent's tone shifting, motivation dipping after a bad result - are almost always there before the exit. Most programs just don't have a system built to catch them.

Where Technology Actually Fits

Philippe Azar, who runs Tennis Hackers, sees the shift already underway among the programs paying attention.

Philippe Azar, Owner and Founder at Tennis Hackers: The academies that will stand out in the future will be the ones that use technology to make development more visible to families, extend engagement beyond the court, and build stronger long-term retention ecosystems - rather than simply delivering coaching sessions.
Philippe Azar, Owner & Founder, Tennis Hackers

None of these eight people are describing the same problem from the same angle - an investor, a performance architect, a governing executive, an academy founder, a parent advocate, a VC. But they keep landing on the same conclusion. The coaching in youth sports has never been better. What's missing is the system that makes the hours between sessions visible to everyone who's invested in the athlete - the coach, the parent, and the athlete themselves.

2026 Global Tennis Academy Report - 10 academies, 3 continents, one direction

That's the gap our full report maps in detail, academy by academy.

Read the Full Report →